Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., ... Horvitz, E. (2019). Guidelines for human AI interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1 to 13. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300233
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610 to 623. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2023). Generative AI at work. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 31161. doi:10.3386/w31161
Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI assisted decision making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction, 5, Article 188, pp. 1 to 21. doi:10.1145/3449287
Castelo, N., Bos, M. W., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019). Task dependent algorithm aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), pp. 809 to 825. doi:10.1177/0022243719851788
Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), pp. 637 to 643.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp. 350 to 383. doi:10.2307/2666999
European Union. (2024). Regulation 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence: Artificial Intelligence Act. Official Journal of the European Union.
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), pp. 62 to 70. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), pp. 627 to 660. doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0057
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), pp. 577 to 586. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), pp. 366 to 410. doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), pp. 633 to 705.
Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, pp. 90 to 103. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 71 to 87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework: AI RMF 1.0. NIST AI 100 1.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). Artificial intelligence risk management framework: Generative artificial intelligence profile. NIST AI 600 1.
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), pp. 187 to 192. doi:10.1126/science.adh2586
OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instrument 0449.
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), pp. 230 to 253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), pp. 192 to 210. doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith Lewis, J., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end to end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 33 to 44. doi:10.1145/3351095.3372873
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 59 to 68. doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), pp. 66 to 83. doi:10.1177/0008125619862257
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in administrative organizations. Free Press.
Stanford HAI. (2025). AI Index Report 2025. Stanford University.
Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. V. (2021). A framework for understanding sources of harm throughout the machine learning life cycle. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, pp. 1 to 9. doi:10.1145/3465416.3483305
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.
